<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beep Work &#187; Lotus Elise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beepwork.org/category/lotus-elise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beepwork.org</link>
	<description>Car Talk for Car Business Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lotus Elise VS Honda S2000</title>
		<link>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/01/29/lotus-elise-vs-honda-s2000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/01/29/lotus-elise-vs-honda-s2000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lotus Elise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rear-Wheel-Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda S2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two-Seaters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beepwork.org/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Honda S2000 and the Lotus Elise &#8211; two roadsters, both originally produced in the 1990s, both using high-revving four-cylinder engines and both symbolising long-held traditions of their builders. Even so, the similarities of the two roadsters end there, one using a classic front-engined layout, the other combining cutting-edge construction and a mid-engined configuration. Of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-234" title="a77ac3de235429fac9c18a5927aa1e1" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/a77ac3de235429fac9c18a5927aa1e1-300x172.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="172" /></p>
<p>The Honda S2000 and the Lotus Elise &#8211; two roadsters, both originally produced in the 1990s, both using high-revving four-cylinder engines and both symbolising long-held traditions of their builders.</p>
<p>Even so, the similarities of the two roadsters end there, one using a classic front-engined layout, the other combining cutting-edge construction and a mid-engined configuration. Of course, Honda and Lotus have formidable motorsport experience, and both channel this into their road cars and use it as a basis for their trademark engineering approaches.</p>
<p>Honda&#8217;s high-revving, naturally aspirated engines are justly famed. And Lotus is equally hailed for its lightweight, minimalist approach and application of innovative chassis technology.</p>
<p>The Honda S2000&#8242;s handsome, classical roadster proportions were matched with a simply incredible 2.0-litre engine capable of revving to 9,000rpm. A true drivers car, the S2000 gained a reputation for somewhat snappy handling that Honda has addressed with a number of tweaks and upgrades, most recently at the beginning of 2007 models &#8211; including Honda introducing traction control, which was a must for this lairy &#8216;rear end happy&#8217; car!</p>
<p>But can an updated version of a nine-year-old car really take on Lotus&#8217;s latest and greatest?  The British corner being fought by the supercharged Elise SC. Weighing just over 900kg and powered by a supercharged 1.8-litre Toyota engine revving to over 8,000rpm, this latest Elise is a formidable package.</p>
<p>I think if these two roadsters were put together on a track, i think we can safely say it would be very entertaining and we would be standing back and watching the sparks fly&#8230;!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/aa20163032df67cef4d25212b9a5.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-235" title="aa20163032df67cef4d25212b9a5" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/aa20163032df67cef4d25212b9a5.jpg" alt="" width="265" height="179" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Lotus Elise Statistics</strong> </p>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Engine – 1.8 litre supercharged</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Power (BHP) – 218 @ 8,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Torque (lb/ft) – 156 @ 5,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">0 – 62 MPH (secs) – 4.6</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Top Speed (MPH) – 148</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Combined MPG – 33.2</p>
<p><span>List Price &#8211; £33,500</span> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/5246f63ebe47621a364fe1add1147.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-236" title="5246f63ebe47621a364fe1add1147" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/5246f63ebe47621a364fe1add1147.jpg" alt="" width="239" height="184" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Honda S2000&#8242;s Statistics</strong></p>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Engine – 2.0 Litre four-cylinder</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Power (BHP) – 240 @ 8,300</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Torque (lb/ft) – 153 @ 7,500</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">0 – 62 MPH (secs) – 6.2</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Top Speed (MPH) – 150</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Combined MPG – 28.2</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">List Price &#8211; £29,500</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/760d048a19452fea95c8d182ffd3.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-237" title="760d048a19452fea95c8d182ffd3" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/760d048a19452fea95c8d182ffd3-300x181.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="181" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/01/29/lotus-elise-vs-honda-s2000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
