<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beep Work &#187; Roadsters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beepwork.org/category/roadsters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beepwork.org</link>
	<description>Car Talk for Car Business Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:18:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Madza MX-5 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/18/madza-mx-5-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/18/madza-mx-5-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mazda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rear-Wheel-Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madza MX-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two-Seater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beepwork.org/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ever-popular MX-5 gets a fresh look for 2009, detail upgrades, an auto option and slight improvements to both emissions and fuel efficiency, the MX-5 is apparently a lot of fun to drive, rear-wheel drive balance,&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-253 alignleft" title="3453b731b4e1dc1aa87f6cc6732c31-300x180" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/3453b731b4e1dc1aa87f6cc6732c31-300x180.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></p>
<p>The ever-popular MX-5 gets a fresh look for 2009, detail upgrades, an auto option and slight improvements to both emissions and fuel efficiency, the MX-5 is apparently a lot of fun to drive, rear-wheel drive balance, improved 2.0-litre engine, quick and easy manual hood, fuss-free Roadster-Coupé option. </p>
<p>The price range for the new Madza MX-5 is between £16,350 &#8211; £20-695, and is available from April 2009, its key rivals are Peugeot 207 CC, Audi TT Convertible, Lotus Elise and the Honda S2000. </p>
<p>Why wouldn’t you want to own a MX-5? If your answer is you need more than two seats then fair enough. But if you’re about to mouth the words ‘because it’s a hairdresser’s car’ you’re wrong. End of. Because the Mazda roadster here in new facelifted form is about as joyful a car as you could wish to drive.</p>
<div class="articlepara">
<div class="paraabs">
<p>The formula is timeless and yet 20 years ago everyone thought Mazda was mad to launch its modern interpretation of the classic British two-seat roadster and nobody has managed to match its arch combination of driver appeal, affordability and all-round fun. </p></div>
</div>
<div class="articlepara">
<div class="paraabs">
<p>The MX-5 does have a lack of masculinity, and most males usually would prefer to buy a turbocharged front-wheel drive hot hatch, missing the fact that mechanically the MX-5 is more pure-bred sports car than many supposedly more macho performance cars.</p>
<p>The MX-5 was first launched in 2005 and followed a year later by the folding hardtop Roadster-Coupé version - this third-generation MX-5 was a big departure from the closely related mark one and two. This facelift brings the usual aesthetic finessing and spec revisions, big news including a higher-revving 2.0-litre engine and modifications to the front suspension to calm the occasionally twitchy steering. </p>
<p>The entry level 126 BHP 1.8-litre is sweet rather than potent and gets a five-speed gearbox and 16-inch wheels small but significant details. The bigger changes come on the 2.0-litre engine, with 160hp there’s a useful amount of extra power, 2.0-litre cars also getting a limited-slip differential and, on Sport models, a six-speed manual gearbox and uprated Bilstein dampers. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/c82fb4784ec925084aa3666a0b024-300x180.jpg" rel="fancybox-gallery"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-254" title="c82fb4784ec925084aa3666a0b024-300x180" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/c82fb4784ec925084aa3666a0b024-300x180.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/18/madza-mx-5-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class (55 AMG)</title>
		<link>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/11/mercedes-benz-slk-class-55-amg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/11/mercedes-benz-slk-class-55-amg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modified Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55 AMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes-Benz SLK 55 AMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beepwork.org/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class 55 AMG is a comfort executive car constructed by the German company Mercedes-Benz since 1997 and there has been two productions of SLK cars by the German car production giant since first introduced.  The Mercedes-Benz SLK55&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-248 alignleft" title="2008_mercedes_benz_slk55_amg_1" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/2008_mercedes_benz_slk55_amg_1-300x187.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class 55 AMG is a comfort executive car constructed by the German company Mercedes-Benz since 1997 and there has been two productions of SLK cars by the German car production giant since first introduced. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG built with V8 engine and the productivity is 342BHP &#8211; 367BHP at 5500 rpm with 382 ft.lbf &#8211; 391 ft.lbf of torque at 2800-5400 rpm.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The 0-62 mph figure of the AMG is estimated at 4.9 seconds but others have claimed times of less than 4.3 seconds. Which is a fantastic figure for mercedes to use to promote the car, along with this the AMG has many other features including amplified brake capability, supplementary engine oil chiller, AMG body gear with unique gills in frontage bumpers, leather finished interior and 19-inch wheels. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>A Roof regulator which</span></span><span> permits the cars roof to be released and closed by remote. (Can be operated under 5mph) and while driving without holding down the button. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>LED light system which includes</span></span><span> plate lights, signal indicators, etc. The Brake lights are previously LEDs, but now Indicators on the Rearview mirror are LEDs and third brake light enlighten the axis LED light in pause or rhythm.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/11/mercedes-benz-slk-class-55-amg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nissan 350Z 3.5-Litre V6</title>
		<link>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/06/nissan-350z-35-litre-v6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/06/nissan-350z-35-litre-v6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rear-Wheel-Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.5 Litre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[350Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan 350Z]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beepwork.org/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nissan have made a properly sorted and internationally appealing sportscar called the Nissan 350Z. It’s far from perfect, but the rawness and emotion it dishes up is almost unique in this price range. The 350Z&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/06_350z_pr_05-szm.jpg" rel="fancybox-gallery"><img class="size-medium wp-image-242 alignleft" title="06_350z_pr_05-szm" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/06_350z_pr_05-szm-300x130.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="130" /></a></p>
<p>Nissan have made a properly sorted and internationally appealing sportscar called the Nissan 350Z. It’s far from perfect, but the rawness and emotion it dishes up is almost unique in this price range.</p>
<p>The 350Z has a 3.5-litre V6 engine which provides 309bhp, making it good for a limited 155mph and capable of hitting 60mph in under six seconds and it feels and sounds amazing as you get yourself up to the 155mph mark. </p>
<p>The 350Z is not a car to be trifled with, being compact, powerful and rear-wheel drive. It transmits its intentions slowly and clearly, but a regular one of those is power over-steer. </p>
<p>The practicality of the 350Z doesn&#8217;t stretch too far though, there are a fair few clever storage solutions around the cosy cockpit, but the boot is massively hampered by a huge rear strut brace. A real afterthought by Nissan, that one, but at least it handles as a result&#8230;</p>
<p>Another all-round fun car for real driving enthusiasts, especially with all this icy weather and rear wheel drive, can be a be dangerous but if you know how to handle the car correctly then the fun you will have will be endless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/02/06/nissan-350z-35-litre-v6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lotus Elise VS Honda S2000</title>
		<link>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/01/29/lotus-elise-vs-honda-s2000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/01/29/lotus-elise-vs-honda-s2000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lotus Elise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rear-Wheel-Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda S2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two-Seaters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beepwork.org/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Honda S2000 and the Lotus Elise &#8211; two roadsters, both originally produced in the 1990s, both using high-revving four-cylinder engines and both symbolising long-held traditions of their builders. Even so, the similarities of the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-234" title="a77ac3de235429fac9c18a5927aa1e1" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/a77ac3de235429fac9c18a5927aa1e1-300x172.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="172" /></p>
<p>The Honda S2000 and the Lotus Elise &#8211; two roadsters, both originally produced in the 1990s, both using high-revving four-cylinder engines and both symbolising long-held traditions of their builders.</p>
<p>Even so, the similarities of the two roadsters end there, one using a classic front-engined layout, the other combining cutting-edge construction and a mid-engined configuration. Of course, Honda and Lotus have formidable motorsport experience, and both channel this into their road cars and use it as a basis for their trademark engineering approaches.</p>
<p>Honda&#8217;s high-revving, naturally aspirated engines are justly famed. And Lotus is equally hailed for its lightweight, minimalist approach and application of innovative chassis technology.</p>
<p>The Honda S2000&#8242;s handsome, classical roadster proportions were matched with a simply incredible 2.0-litre engine capable of revving to 9,000rpm. A true drivers car, the S2000 gained a reputation for somewhat snappy handling that Honda has addressed with a number of tweaks and upgrades, most recently at the beginning of 2007 models &#8211; including Honda introducing traction control, which was a must for this lairy &#8216;rear end happy&#8217; car!</p>
<p>But can an updated version of a nine-year-old car really take on Lotus&#8217;s latest and greatest?  The British corner being fought by the supercharged Elise SC. Weighing just over 900kg and powered by a supercharged 1.8-litre Toyota engine revving to over 8,000rpm, this latest Elise is a formidable package.</p>
<p>I think if these two roadsters were put together on a track, i think we can safely say it would be very entertaining and we would be standing back and watching the sparks fly&#8230;!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/aa20163032df67cef4d25212b9a5.jpg" rel="fancybox-gallery"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-235" title="aa20163032df67cef4d25212b9a5" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/aa20163032df67cef4d25212b9a5.jpg" alt="" width="265" height="179" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Lotus Elise Statistics</strong> </p>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Engine – 1.8 litre supercharged</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Power (BHP) – 218 @ 8,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Torque (lb/ft) – 156 @ 5,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">0 – 62 MPH (secs) – 4.6</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Top Speed (MPH) – 148</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Combined MPG – 33.2</p>
<p><span>List Price &#8211; £33,500</span> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/5246f63ebe47621a364fe1add1147.jpg" rel="fancybox-gallery"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-236" title="5246f63ebe47621a364fe1add1147" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/5246f63ebe47621a364fe1add1147.jpg" alt="" width="239" height="184" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Honda S2000&#8242;s Statistics</strong></p>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Engine – 2.0 Litre four-cylinder</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Power (BHP) – 240 @ 8,300</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Torque (lb/ft) – 153 @ 7,500</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">0 – 62 MPH (secs) – 6.2</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Top Speed (MPH) – 150</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Combined MPG – 28.2</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">List Price &#8211; £29,500</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/760d048a19452fea95c8d182ffd3.jpg" rel="fancybox-gallery"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-237" title="760d048a19452fea95c8d182ffd3" src="http://www.beepwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/760d048a19452fea95c8d182ffd3-300x181.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="181" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beepwork.org/2009/01/29/lotus-elise-vs-honda-s2000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

